1
00:00:03,860 --> 00:00:02,360
data before the emotional picture so

2
00:00:10,520 --> 00:00:03,870
means your eyes closed more which means

3
00:00:13,730 --> 00:00:10,530
people are blinking more you could also

4
00:00:16,189 --> 00:00:13,740
ask a question about which which

5
00:00:18,250 --> 00:00:16,199
direction people tend to look before the

6
00:00:20,330 --> 00:00:18,260
picture arises and that's because

7
00:00:21,710 --> 00:00:20,340
right-handed subjects tend to look to

8
00:00:24,620 --> 00:00:21,720
the left when answering effective

9
00:00:26,839 --> 00:00:24,630
questions and as shown in the brain hear

10
00:00:29,810 --> 00:00:26,849
that when if you're simply ask somebody

11
00:00:31,580 --> 00:00:29,820
to let their eyes wander and you tell

12
00:00:33,350 --> 00:00:31,590
them to think about an emotional picture

13
00:00:35,000 --> 00:00:33,360
or to actually look at emotional picture

14
00:00:36,470 --> 00:00:35,010
their eyes will tend to move to the left

15
00:00:38,090 --> 00:00:36,480
because the right half of the brain is

16
00:00:40,130 --> 00:00:38,100
doing most of the emotional processing

17
00:00:42,200 --> 00:00:40,140
so a question here is well do they also

18
00:00:44,959 --> 00:00:42,210
look to the left before they see a

19
00:00:48,080 --> 00:00:44,969
randomly selected effective picture so

20
00:00:50,750 --> 00:00:48,090
we're looking at here are the five

21
00:00:52,369 --> 00:00:50,760
percent of most calm trials the comest

22
00:00:54,410 --> 00:00:52,379
of the calm trials that people looked at

23
00:00:56,290 --> 00:00:54,420
and then the vertical axis is lies

24
00:00:58,520 --> 00:00:56,300
moving to the left and to the right

25
00:01:00,799 --> 00:00:58,530
here's where the trial begins there's

26
00:01:02,750 --> 00:01:00,809
where the stimulus is and the eye moves

27
00:01:04,670 --> 00:01:02,760
pretty much flat it moves a little bit

28
00:01:07,210 --> 00:01:04,680
to the left but not very much for calm

29
00:01:09,500 --> 00:01:07,220
trials but for emotional trials it

30
00:01:11,330 --> 00:01:09,510
actually moves significantly to the left

31
00:01:13,429 --> 00:01:11,340
and of course once they see the picture

32
00:01:15,530 --> 00:01:13,439
the eye moves a lot to the left but even

33
00:01:17,060 --> 00:01:15,540
before hand and what this is important

34
00:01:18,800 --> 00:01:17,070
because it means that people are not

35
00:01:20,749 --> 00:01:18,810
simply responding to the emotionality of

36
00:01:21,980 --> 00:01:20,759
their their future but they're also

37
00:01:24,170 --> 00:01:21,990
responding to something about the

38
00:01:26,200 --> 00:01:24,180
content of it as well there's like the

39
00:01:28,670 --> 00:01:26,210
right hat right half of the brain is

40
00:01:30,170 --> 00:01:28,680
going into emotional processing and

41
00:01:31,850 --> 00:01:30,180
their eyes are then tending to move into

42
00:01:34,190 --> 00:01:31,860
that direction these are pretty small

43
00:01:36,280 --> 00:01:34,200
degrees of deviation by the way but

44
00:01:38,480 --> 00:01:36,290
nevertheless it's a significant result

45
00:01:42,399 --> 00:01:38,490
the other thing that we can look at is

46
00:01:44,810 --> 00:01:42,409
we know as who mentioned yesterday

47
00:01:47,630 --> 00:01:44,820
somebody mentioned yesterday that Oh

48
00:01:49,730 --> 00:01:47,640
Todd Richards mentioned that if you're

49
00:01:51,679 --> 00:01:49,740
imagine if you're told to imagine

50
00:01:53,569 --> 00:01:51,689
something and you track how your eyes

51
00:01:54,950 --> 00:01:53,579
move your eyes will move in the way that

52
00:01:58,130 --> 00:01:54,960
tracks what's going on inside your head

53
00:01:59,899 --> 00:01:58,140
so it's a way of getting an external

54
00:02:01,639 --> 00:01:59,909
objective measure of something which is

55
00:02:03,170 --> 00:02:01,649
actually completely subjective namely

56
00:02:05,690 --> 00:02:03,180
your imagery so if i asked you to

57
00:02:07,700 --> 00:02:05,700
imagine a snake and we attract your eye

58
00:02:10,400 --> 00:02:07,710
movements you'd get some kind of

59
00:02:12,050 --> 00:02:10,410
squiggle if we then ask you to look at a

60
00:02:13,250 --> 00:02:12,060
snake and we track your eye movements

61
00:02:15,679 --> 00:02:13,260
you get some kind of squiggle

62
00:02:17,569 --> 00:02:15,689
and we can then compare them and do a

63
00:02:19,970 --> 00:02:17,579
correlation to see the degree to which

64
00:02:21,110 --> 00:02:19,980
they match and so if you do these kinds

65
00:02:23,420 --> 00:02:21,120
of experiments you see a positive

66
00:02:25,190 --> 00:02:23,430
correlation between I've movements of

67
00:02:26,509 --> 00:02:25,200
things inside your head versus eye

68
00:02:28,190 --> 00:02:26,519
movements of things are looking out in

69
00:02:31,580 --> 00:02:28,200
the world and that allows us in this

70
00:02:33,080 --> 00:02:31,590
experiment to see whether I've movements

71
00:02:35,089 --> 00:02:33,090
before seeing a picture match the eye

72
00:02:37,250 --> 00:02:35,099
movements while seeing a picture and if

73
00:02:38,600 --> 00:02:37,260
that occurs it suggests that people are

74
00:02:41,479 --> 00:02:38,610
not getting just the emotional content

75
00:02:43,220 --> 00:02:41,489
not just the brain working but you're

76
00:02:46,339 --> 00:02:43,230
you're beginning to actually get an

77
00:02:48,259 --> 00:02:46,349
image of what you're about to see which

78
00:02:50,330 --> 00:02:48,269
which it goes further and further in the

79
00:02:52,129 --> 00:02:50,340
direction of your getting both the

80
00:02:55,129 --> 00:02:52,139
emotional content and the actual image

81
00:02:58,099 --> 00:02:55,139
of the future itself so here's the

82
00:03:00,470 --> 00:02:58,109
person looking into the future you get

83
00:03:01,910 --> 00:03:00,480
some kind of a squiggle before they look

84
00:03:05,059 --> 00:03:01,920
at it and while they're looking at it

85
00:03:06,710 --> 00:03:05,069
and if you take a group of five people

86
00:03:09,080 --> 00:03:06,720
the five people in this experiment who

87
00:03:11,449 --> 00:03:09,090
did the worst they got as close to

88
00:03:13,339 --> 00:03:11,459
chance as possible the correlation and

89
00:03:15,220 --> 00:03:13,349
the two squiggles that they get is very

90
00:03:17,390 --> 00:03:15,230
close to zero is non significant effect

91
00:03:20,210 --> 00:03:17,400
we take the five people to show the

92
00:03:22,220 --> 00:03:20,220
strongest result you get a very small

93
00:03:24,619 --> 00:03:22,230
but positive correlation which turned

94
00:03:28,069 --> 00:03:24,629
out to be statistically significant so

95
00:03:30,830 --> 00:03:28,079
the answer to the question is yes weakly

96
00:03:34,330 --> 00:03:30,840
I movements before do match the eye

97
00:03:36,830 --> 00:03:34,340
movements afterwards to a small degree

98
00:03:38,509 --> 00:03:36,840
well what is presentiments see does it

99
00:03:41,689 --> 00:03:38,519
see the probable future or the actual

100
00:03:44,900 --> 00:03:41,699
future this is something that Garrett

101
00:03:47,059 --> 00:03:44,910
was leading towards and I have to

102
00:03:49,849 --> 00:03:47,069
acknowledge an abortus who was an intern

103
00:03:53,300 --> 00:03:49,859
at ions who can help me conduct this

104
00:03:55,250 --> 00:03:53,310
experiment well what do you see well

105
00:03:57,289 --> 00:03:55,260
here's now there's the future one thing

106
00:03:59,240 --> 00:03:57,299
we might see is when a precognition

107
00:04:01,550 --> 00:03:59,250
occurs we're looking at superposed

108
00:04:03,619 --> 00:04:01,560
futures we're looking at possibilities

109
00:04:06,140 --> 00:04:03,629
in the future but were able to see them

110
00:04:07,670 --> 00:04:06,150
directly and that's that's what we get

111
00:04:09,500 --> 00:04:07,680
back and because of the uncertainty of

112
00:04:11,990 --> 00:04:09,510
the future events this is why

113
00:04:13,969 --> 00:04:12,000
precognition isn't so good because we're

114
00:04:17,599 --> 00:04:13,979
seeing an inherently uncertain future

115
00:04:21,379 --> 00:04:17,609
another possibility is that there's one

116
00:04:24,800 --> 00:04:21,389
single preordained future but we see it

117
00:04:26,840 --> 00:04:24,810
through a glass darkly we see it through

118
00:04:28,850 --> 00:04:26,850
a perceptual process which is distorted

119
00:04:31,010 --> 00:04:28,860
so that's why precognition is not always

120
00:04:32,390 --> 00:04:31,020
one hundred percent and another

121
00:04:35,380 --> 00:04:32,400
possibility similar to the first one

122
00:04:37,970 --> 00:04:35,390
where what we see in the present are

123
00:04:39,980 --> 00:04:37,980
probabilities of things and the future

124
00:04:41,090 --> 00:04:39,990
is actually completely indeterminate but

125
00:04:44,540 --> 00:04:41,100
in the present there's always the

126
00:04:46,940 --> 00:04:44,550
likelihood of things about to occur and

127
00:04:49,580 --> 00:04:46,950
in this case precognition is not perfect

128
00:04:52,040 --> 00:04:49,590
because there are only potentials of

129
00:04:53,870 --> 00:04:52,050
things about to unfold so here's the

130
00:04:55,310 --> 00:04:53,880
original presentiments I'm where you

131
00:04:57,440 --> 00:04:55,320
press a button and there are six hundred

132
00:04:58,700 --> 00:04:57,450
possible targets and then sometime in

133
00:05:01,910 --> 00:04:58,710
the future one of them is randomly

134
00:05:03,950 --> 00:05:01,920
selected so we do a new design where you

135
00:05:05,990 --> 00:05:03,960
when you press a button to begin only

136
00:05:07,490 --> 00:05:06,000
two targets are selected one is

137
00:05:08,570 --> 00:05:07,500
emotional and one is calm but they're

138
00:05:11,540 --> 00:05:08,580
assigned different a priori

139
00:05:13,820 --> 00:05:11,550
probabilities so when the when you the

140
00:05:15,620 --> 00:05:13,830
future arrives according to these

141
00:05:18,380 --> 00:05:15,630
probabilities the target is actually

142
00:05:21,740 --> 00:05:18,390
selected and what this allows us to do

143
00:05:23,930 --> 00:05:21,750
then is the following eighty percent of

144
00:05:26,210 --> 00:05:23,940
the time by design the probable and the

145
00:05:28,730 --> 00:05:26,220
actual futures are the same probable to

146
00:05:30,470 --> 00:05:28,740
actual and that that's what the original

147
00:05:33,440 --> 00:05:30,480
experiment was and it actually doesn't

148
00:05:34,850 --> 00:05:33,450
tell us anything new but the so we can't

149
00:05:36,950 --> 00:05:34,860
distinguish between the probable in the

150
00:05:39,350 --> 00:05:36,960
actual future but twenty percent of the

151
00:05:42,200 --> 00:05:39,360
time you get a crossover a probable

152
00:05:44,570 --> 00:05:42,210
emotional event becomes actually common

153
00:05:45,830 --> 00:05:44,580
a probable calm becomes actual emotional

154
00:05:47,960 --> 00:05:45,840
and under those conditions we can

155
00:05:49,580 --> 00:05:47,970
distinguish between what is what is

156
00:05:51,500 --> 00:05:49,590
pulling the precognition is it the

157
00:05:55,220 --> 00:05:51,510
probable present or is it the actual

158
00:05:57,290 --> 00:05:55,230
future so the first case is this what

159
00:05:59,360 --> 00:05:57,300
you're being attracted to is in the

160
00:06:00,560 --> 00:05:59,370
present the probable present so even if

161
00:06:02,510 --> 00:06:00,570
the future turned out to be a bunny

162
00:06:04,340 --> 00:06:02,520
you're going to be you're going to show

163
00:06:06,110 --> 00:06:04,350
an emotional response because you're

164
00:06:08,180 --> 00:06:06,120
looking at a snake or you're looking at

165
00:06:10,670 --> 00:06:08,190
the probable presence of a snake and the

166
00:06:12,260 --> 00:06:10,680
other possibility is that it doesn't

167
00:06:13,790 --> 00:06:12,270
matter what the probabilities are in the

168
00:06:15,800 --> 00:06:13,800
present you're only attracted to the

169
00:06:18,890 --> 00:06:15,810
future event so when you do this

170
00:06:22,780 --> 00:06:18,900
experiment it turns out that this is the

171
00:06:25,730 --> 00:06:22,790
case this line shows the present

172
00:06:29,600 --> 00:06:25,740
probable calm turning into an emotional

173
00:06:31,670 --> 00:06:29,610
future and this line shows the probable

174
00:06:34,820 --> 00:06:31,680
emotional present turning into an actual

175
00:06:36,950 --> 00:06:34,830
calm and given that the the way that

176
00:06:40,110 --> 00:06:36,960
this is separated this is a significant

177
00:06:41,760 --> 00:06:40,120
difference here this says

178
00:06:44,310 --> 00:06:41,770
that the seer is seeing the actual

179
00:06:47,969 --> 00:06:44,320
future and as independent of the

180
00:06:49,560 --> 00:06:47,979
probable present you see why because

181
00:06:51,719 --> 00:06:49,570
here we are in the present this is the

182
00:06:53,879 --> 00:06:51,729
one that's pulling pupil dilation up

183
00:06:57,420 --> 00:06:53,889
even though in the president it was calm

184
00:07:01,170 --> 00:06:57,430
and here we are with a probable or

185
00:07:03,150 --> 00:07:01,180
actual calm future and that is its pupil

186
00:07:04,770 --> 00:07:03,160
dilation is lower so this is a way of

187
00:07:06,870 --> 00:07:04,780
discriminating in this kind of

188
00:07:09,060 --> 00:07:06,880
presentiments periment as to what it is

189
00:07:13,050 --> 00:07:09,070
the seer is seeing they're seeing the

190
00:07:14,909 --> 00:07:13,060
actual future so now this other

191
00:07:18,120 --> 00:07:14,919
experiment involving mind matter

192
00:07:22,370 --> 00:07:18,130
interaction at the at the quantum level

193
00:07:26,730 --> 00:07:24,510
you're probably all familiar with what

194
00:07:29,430 --> 00:07:26,740
happens if you shine a light through or

195
00:07:32,120 --> 00:07:29,440
send electrons through a single slit you

196
00:07:34,710 --> 00:07:32,130
get a particulate form of a distribution

197
00:07:36,450 --> 00:07:34,720
and if you send it through a double slit

198
00:07:38,550 --> 00:07:36,460
you get an interference pattern this is

199
00:07:42,810 --> 00:07:38,560
the way of demonstrating very easily the

200
00:07:44,250 --> 00:07:42,820
particle wave duality of light you

201
00:07:46,350 --> 00:07:44,260
probably also know then and if you take

202
00:07:48,240 --> 00:07:46,360
a system that you present a single

203
00:07:50,010 --> 00:07:48,250
electron or a single photon at a time

204
00:07:53,700 --> 00:07:50,020
through a double slit you might expect

205
00:07:55,409 --> 00:07:53,710
to get shadows of slits behind it but in

206
00:07:57,330 --> 00:07:55,419
fact you don't get that what you get is

207
00:07:59,070 --> 00:07:57,340
an interference pattern again showing

208
00:08:01,440 --> 00:07:59,080
that there's something inherent in the

209
00:08:04,740 --> 00:08:01,450
in what appears to be a particle which

210
00:08:06,360 --> 00:08:04,750
actually has a wave-like structure but

211
00:08:08,580 --> 00:08:06,370
it's much more curious than that because

212
00:08:10,020 --> 00:08:08,590
if you take a double slit system and you

213
00:08:12,839 --> 00:08:10,030
get an interference pattern but now you

214
00:08:15,659 --> 00:08:12,849
ask somebody to gain knowledge about

215
00:08:17,580 --> 00:08:15,669
which one of the slits the photon passed

216
00:08:19,230 --> 00:08:17,590
through the act of gaining knowledge

217
00:08:22,670 --> 00:08:19,240
will cause the interference pattern to

218
00:08:26,250 --> 00:08:22,680
go away and to come back and get a

219
00:08:28,170 --> 00:08:26,260
particulate pattern and this is called

220
00:08:30,960 --> 00:08:28,180
gaining which path information and it's

221
00:08:33,000 --> 00:08:30,970
where consciousness gets in to quantum

222
00:08:36,240 --> 00:08:33,010
mechanics and there's no way to get it

223
00:08:37,199 --> 00:08:36,250
out actually so the act of gaining

224
00:08:39,510 --> 00:08:37,209
knowledge about the state of a quantum

225
00:08:42,870 --> 00:08:39,520
system collapses its indeterminate

226
00:08:45,420 --> 00:08:42,880
wave-like system into or characteristic

227
00:08:47,970 --> 00:08:45,430
into determined particles even after

228
00:08:49,470 --> 00:08:47,980
going through the slit so as Kourtney

229
00:08:51,240 --> 00:08:49,480
suggested on the delayed choice

230
00:08:53,490 --> 00:08:51,250
experiment it doesn't matter whether you

231
00:08:54,630 --> 00:08:53,500
know that the photon is about to go

232
00:08:56,520 --> 00:08:54,640
through a slit where it already went

233
00:08:58,650 --> 00:08:56,530
through the slit in either direction it

234
00:09:01,290 --> 00:08:58,660
works because from the photons point of

235
00:09:02,640 --> 00:09:01,300
view there's no time and apparently from

236
00:09:04,650 --> 00:09:02,650
some element of our consciousness

237
00:09:08,160 --> 00:09:04,660
there's no time either at least we were

238
00:09:09,750 --> 00:09:08,170
able to see through time so I said okay

239
00:09:12,120 --> 00:09:09,760
that's an interesting experiment what if

240
00:09:14,580 --> 00:09:12,130
we ask somebody with their minds eye

241
00:09:16,110 --> 00:09:14,590
from a distance to try to gain

242
00:09:17,910 --> 00:09:16,120
information about where the photon was

243
00:09:19,920 --> 00:09:17,920
going to look at one of the slits and

244
00:09:21,090 --> 00:09:19,930
try to gain knowledge because the whole

245
00:09:23,160 --> 00:09:21,100
thing about remote viewing and

246
00:09:24,690 --> 00:09:23,170
clairvoyance is that somehow it seems

247
00:09:26,340 --> 00:09:24,700
like you're gaining knowledge from the

248
00:09:28,380 --> 00:09:26,350
world somewhere but you're not through

249
00:09:31,410 --> 00:09:28,390
your eyes coming from somewhere else so

250
00:09:33,780 --> 00:09:31,420
do an experiment of this type and the

251
00:09:35,430 --> 00:09:33,790
question is from from any conventional

252
00:09:36,840 --> 00:09:35,440
point of view you'd expect that asking

253
00:09:38,280 --> 00:09:36,850
somebody to put the riot a distance

254
00:09:39,420 --> 00:09:38,290
wouldn't make any difference in here

255
00:09:41,910 --> 00:09:39,430
you'd always get an interference pattern

256
00:09:44,460 --> 00:09:41,920
but if remote viewing is real then

257
00:09:46,200 --> 00:09:44,470
perhaps it would collapse and you'd look

258
00:09:48,030 --> 00:09:46,210
you'd see a particular pattern even with

259
00:09:50,040 --> 00:09:48,040
a double slit or maybe you'd get

260
00:09:52,800 --> 00:09:50,050
somewhere in between because remote

261
00:09:54,840 --> 00:09:52,810
viewing is not perfect this of course is

262
00:09:57,150 --> 00:09:54,850
part of the shorting there's cat paradox